Scientifically estimate calories burned during any physical activity using Metabolic Equivalent (MET).Accurate for walking, running, cycling, gym workouts, sports, and daily activities.Based on the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities.
The Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) is a physiological measure expressing the energy cost of physical activities. 1 MET equals the resting metabolic rate — approximately 1 kcal/kg/hour. When you exercise, the MET value multiplies your resting energy expenditure. For instance, running at 6 mph (MET 9.8) burns 9.8 times more calories per hour than sitting quietly. This calculator uses the well-established formula:
Validated by decades of exercise physiology research (Ainsworth et al., 2011; 2024 Compendium Update), MET values provide a standardized way to compare different activities regardless of individual fitness differences. Our tool relies on the official 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities, which lists over 1,200 specific activities with their assigned METs.
| Activity | MET | Calories burned per hour (70 kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Sleeping / resting | 0.95 | 66 kcal |
| Standing (light work) | 1.8 | 126 kcal |
| Walking (3 mph, brisk) | 3.5 | 245 kcal |
| Yoga (Hatha) | 3.0 | 210 kcal |
| Weight training (light) | 3.5 | 245 kcal |
| Cycling (moderate, 12-14 mph) | 7.5 | 525 kcal |
| Running (6 mph / 9.7 km/h) | 9.8 | 686 kcal |
| HIIT / CrossFit | 8.7 | 609 kcal |
| Jump rope (moderate pace) | 11.0 | 770 kcal |
A 75‑kg individual walks briskly (3.5 MET) for 45 minutes: 3.5 × 75 × (45/60) = 196 kcal burned. The same person runs at 6 mph (9.8 MET) for 25 minutes: 9.8 × 75 × (25/60) ≈ 306 kcal. Even with shorter duration, running produces ~56% higher calorie burn. Our calculator reveals these differences instantly – perfect for optimizing workout time.
While the MET method is the gold standard for group-level estimation, individual variations exist due to age, sex, muscle mass, and fitness level. For example, a highly trained athlete may have a lower relative energy cost for the same absolute intensity. However, for most practical weight management and activity tracking, MET‑based calculators provide an accurate and reproducible benchmark. For personalized advice, combine this tool with wearable heart rate monitoring or consult a sports dietitian. For personalized recommendations, consider combining this calculator with a heart rate monitor or consulting an exercise physiologist, as factors like lean body mass and fitness adaptation may alter real‑world expenditure by ±10‑15%.