Metal Fatigue Calculator

Estimate fatigue life (cycles to failure) using Basquin relation. Input stress amplitude, material strength, and fatigue parameters. Visualize S‑N curve, endurance limit, and design safe life. Essential for mechanical design, aerospace, and automotive engineering.

All stresses in MPa. Basquin: σa = σf' (2N)b. Endurance limit Se = factor × UTS.
? Steel (UTS 700, Sa 300)
?️ Aluminum (UTS 480, Sa 200)
? Titanium (UTS 900, Sa 500)
⚙️ High‑cycle (Sa low)
Privacy first: All calculations run locally. The S‑N graph is drawn in your browser – no data leaves your device.

Understanding Metal Fatigue: From Microcracks to Failure

Metal fatigue is a progressive, localized damage process caused by cyclic loading. Even if stresses are below the yield strength, repeated cycles can initiate cracks and lead to sudden failure. The S‑N curve (stress vs. number of cycles) characterizes a material’s fatigue behaviour. The Basquin relation describes the high‑cycle fatigue regime: σa = σf' (2N)b, where σf' is the fatigue strength coefficient and b the fatigue exponent (typically between -0.05 and -0.15).

Fatigue life N (cycles to failure) from Basquin:

N = ½ (Sa / σf')1/b

A Historical Perspective & Modern Industrial Relevance

Fatigue research began in the 19th century with railway axle failures. August Wöhler (Germany) systematically tested railroad axles and introduced the S‑N diagram. Later, Basquin (1910) proposed the power‑law relationship. Today, fatigue analysis is mandatory in aerospace (FAA regulations), automotive (ISO 12107), pressure vessels (ASME BPVC), and bridge design. The concept of endurance limit (fatigue limit) is crucial for steels – below this stress, the material can withstand infinite cycles. For aluminum and titanium, a “fatigue strength” at a given number of cycles (e.g. 107) is used.

Why This Tool Matters for Engineers and Designers

  • Design safe components: Quickly estimate allowable stress or life based on material data.
  • Educational tool: Visualize how the S‑N curve shifts with σf' and b, and see the influence of endurance limit.
  • Material selection: Compare different alloys using built‑in presets (steel, aluminum, titanium, cast iron).
  • Research & development: Validate experimental data against Basquin model.

The Basquin Equation: Core Theory and Practical Assumptions

The calculator implements the Basquin equation for high‑cycle fatigue (N > 103 cycles). The fatigue strength coefficient σf' is often approximated as 0.9 × UTS for many steels, while b ranges from -0.05 to -0.12. For aluminum alloys, σf' ≈ 1.4×UTS? Actually common values: 2024‑T3 σf' ≈ 1100 MPa, UTS ≈ 480 MPa, so factor ~2.3. We use realistic presets based on MMPDS (formerly MIL‑HDBK‑5). The endurance limit Se is estimated as factor × UTS (0.5 for steels, 0.3–0.4 for non‑ferrous). If Sa < Se, the model predicts infinite life (theoretically >107 cycles), but we still show the Basquin life for reference (which may be extremely high).

Limitations: Mean stress effects (Goodman, Gerber) are not included; assumes fully reversed loading (R = -1). For other R ratios, use equivalent stress amplitude via a mean stress correction. Also does not cover low‑cycle fatigue (strain‑life approach).

How to Use the Calculator: A Step‑by‑Step Guide

  1. Select a material preset (or keep custom) to set typical σf' and b.
  2. Adjust UTS, endurance limit factor, and fatigue parameters if needed.
  3. Enter the operating stress amplitude Sa.
  4. Click “Calculate” – the tool computes Nf = 0.5 * (Sa / σf')^(1/b).
  5. Endurance limit Se = factor × UTS. Safety factor = Se / Sa (if Se > 0).
  6. The S‑N curve is drawn on a semi‑log plot (log N, linear S). The operating point is marked in red.

Reference Data: Fatigue Parameters for Common Engineering Alloys (MMPDS‑Based)

Values compiled from MMPDS-01 and ASM Handbooks.

Material UTS (MPa) σf' (MPa) b Endurance limit factor
Steel (low alloy, 700 MPa) 700 ~630 -0.085 0.5
Aluminum 2024-T3 480 ~1100 -0.12 0.3
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V 900 ~1500 -0.10 0.4
Gray cast iron 250 ~350 -0.09 0.35
Practical Application: Fatigue Life of an Aircraft Wing Bracket

An aerospace engineer evaluates a 2024-T3 aluminum bracket (UTS 480 MPa) subject to a repeated stress of 200 MPa. Using the calculator with preset “Aluminum”, σf' ≈ 1100 MPa, b = -0.12, endurance limit factor 0.3 → Se = 144 MPa. Since Sa = 200 > Se, finite life is predicted. The tool computes Nf ≈ 2.1×105 cycles. The engineer must either redesign (reduce stress) or plan inspections. The S‑N graph helps visualize the margin.

Designing for Fatigue: Methodologies and Best Practices

Engineers use several approaches: infinite‑life design (stress below endurance limit), safe‑life (predictable finite life with safety factor), and damage tolerance (crack growth analysis). This calculator supports the first two by providing life estimates and safety margins. For critical components, additional factors (load, size, surface finish) are applied to modify Se. The calculator’s factor can be adjusted to account for these (e.g., 0.4 instead of 0.5 for machined surfaces).

Debunking Common Fatigue Myths

  • Fatigue only happens at high stresses: False – even low stresses can cause failure after millions of cycles (high‑cycle fatigue).
  • All materials have an endurance limit: Only ferrous materials typically show a distinct knee; aluminum and titanium do not – their S‑N curve continuously drops.
  • Polishing eliminates fatigue: Surface finish greatly affects crack initiation, but internal defects can still cause failure.
  • Basquin equation applies for all cycles: It’s valid mainly for N > 103; low‑cycle fatigue requires strain‑life models (Coffin‑Manson).

Where Fatigue Analysis is Critical: Industry Use Cases

  • Automotive: Connecting rods, crankshafts, suspension springs.
  • Aerospace: Fuselage skins, landing gear, turbine blades.
  • Biomedical: Hip implants, stents (cyclic loading).
  • Energy: Wind turbine shafts, offshore platforms.

Built on authoritative data – Fatigue parameters are based on MMPDS-01, ASM Handbook Vol.19, and ASTM E739. The calculator’s methodology follows established mechanical engineering practice. Maintained by the GetZenQuery engineering team. Last updated March 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

That usually indicates that Sa is below the endurance limit (or near). For design purposes you may consider it “infinite life” if Sa < Se. However, for non‑ferrous materials without a clear endurance limit, a life of 108 or 109 is often considered “run‑out”.

They are typical values, but actual fatigue properties depend on heat treatment, surface finish, and loading. Always use material test data for critical applications. The presets serve for preliminary estimates and education.

This version assumes fully reversed loading (R=-1). For mean stress, convert your stress amplitude to an equivalent fully reversed amplitude using Goodman or Gerber correction, then input that equivalent Sa.

The graph shows 103 to 109 cycles, the typical range for high‑cycle fatigue. Beyond that, very few materials have data, and other mechanisms (creep, corrosion) dominate.

Low‑cycle fatigue involves plastic strain and is better described by the Coffin‑Manson relation. This tool focuses on high‑cycle (elastic) fatigue. If your life is below ~103 cycles, the Basquin model may overestimate life.

Consult MMPDS (for aerospace), ASM International, or supplier datasheets. Many textbooks (Dowling, “Mechanical Behavior of Materials”) contain tables.
References: ASTM E739; MMPDS-01, Chapter 2; Dowling, N.E. "Mechanical Behavior of Materials" (5th ed.); Wikipedia: Fatigue (material).