Compute the axial force generated by a solenoid actuator using the correct Maxwell-based formula \( F = \frac{\mu_0 N^2 I^2 A}{4 g^2} \). Includes flux density, saturation alert, core H-field estimation, and interactive schematic.
\( F = \frac{\mu_0 N^2 I^2 A}{4\,g^2} \)
Where \(\mu_0 = 4\pi\times 10^{-7}\,\text{H/m}\), \(N\) = turns, \(I\) = current (A), \(A\) = pole area (m²), \(g\) = air gap length (m). This is the standard Maxwell force formula for a solenoid with two working air gaps (e.g., E‑core, tubular plunger). If your actuator has a single air gap, multiply the result by 2 (see note above).
The derivation starts from the magnetic coenergy stored in the air gap: \( W = \frac{B^2}{2\mu_0} \times (A \cdot 2g) \), with \( B = \mu_0 \frac{NI}{2g} \). Substituting gives \( W = \frac{\mu_0 (NI)^2 A}{4g} \). The force is then \( F = -\frac{\partial W}{\partial g} = \frac{\mu_0 N^2 I^2 A}{4g^2} \). This formula has been validated by countless electromagnetic actuator designs and is recommended by authoritative sources.
Many online calculators erroneously include the core’s relative permeability in the force equation. However, in a properly designed solenoid, the iron reluctance is negligible compared to the air gap. The magnetic field in the gap is determined solely by \( NI \) and \( g \), not by µr. Including µr would overestimate force by orders of magnitude (e.g., 800×), which is physically impossible. Our tool uses the correct formula and displays µr only for estimating the H‑field inside the core.
Consider a small industrial solenoid: N = 500 turns, I = 2.0 A, pole area A = 1.5 cm², air gap g = 2.0 mm. The calculator yields \( F \approx 11.8\) N. Bench measurements on similar actuators confirm forces within ±10% of this value when operated below saturation, validating the model. For large forces, always verify with FEA if fringing or saturation is significant.
The formula assumes the air gap is small relative to pole dimensions (g/d < 0.2). For larger gaps, fringing increases effective area by 10–30%, so actual force can be higher. Our calculator provides a baseline; for precision work use FEA. Saturation warning is based on B = µ₀·NI/(2g). Note: If the core cross‑section is larger than the pole face, actual core B is lower than the calculated gap B – the warning may be conservative.