Undrained Shear Strength Calculator

Accurate determination of undrained shear strength for cohesive soils using Unconfined Compression (UCS), Triaxial UU, or Field Vane Shear Test. Essential for foundation bearing capacity, slope stability, and soft clay analysis.

kPa
Standard ASTM D2166: For saturated clays, Su = qu / 2
Examples:
Soft clay (qᵤ=50 kPa)
Firm clay (qᵤ=150 kPa)
Triaxial UU: Δσd=120 kPa
Vane: T=0.12 kNm, D=65mm
Privacy-first: All calculations are client-side. No data uploaded to any server.

Fundamentals of Undrained Shear Strength

Undrained shear strength (Su) represents the maximum shear stress a saturated cohesive soil can sustain under undrained conditions (no pore water drainage). It is a critical parameter for short-term stability analyses in soft clays, foundation design, embankments, and excavation support. For undrained conditions, the total stress friction angle φ=0, and cohesion c = Su. This concept, introduced by Skempton and Terzaghi, is fundamental in modern geotechnics.

Standard relationships:
• Unconfined Compression: Su = qu / 2
• Triaxial UU test: Su = (σ1 - σ3)f / 2
• Field Vane Shear: Su(vane) = T / [ (π D² H)/2 + (π D³)/6 ] (D, H in meters, T in kN·m)

These formulations are recognized by ASTM D2166 (UCS), ASTM D2850 (Triaxial UU), and ASTM D2573 (Vane Shear). The calculator implements these exact standards.

Soil Consistency Based on Su (Terzaghi & Peck, 1967)

Consistency Undrained Strength Su (kPa) Typical Engineering Behavior
Very soft < 12 Fist penetration, extrudes between fingers
Soft 12 – 25 Molded by light finger pressure
Firm 25 – 50 Moderate finger pressure required
Stiff 50 – 100 Indented by thumb with effort
Very stiff 100 – 200 Indented by thumbnail only
Hard > 200 Difficult to indent

Methodological Deep Dive & Applications

Unconfined Compression Test (UCS): A cylindrical clay specimen is loaded axially without confining pressure. Failure occurs when the deviator stress reaches a peak, giving qu. For saturated clays, the Mohr circle at failure has a radius Su = qu/2. This is the simplest index test for routine site characterization. However, it may overestimate Su for fissured or sensitive clays.

Triaxial UU Test: Specimen is saturated, consolidated under a cell pressure (σ3), then sheared rapidly without drainage. The measured deviator stress Δσd at failure gives Su = Δσd/2, independent of the cell pressure. This test provides more reliable strength parameters for clays with low permeability.

Vane Shear Test: A four-bladed vane is pushed into the soil and rotated at a constant rate. The maximum torque T is used to compute Su. The method is ideal for soft to firm clays in-situ and yields the undisturbed undrained strength. Our calculator uses the standard equation for a rectangular vane with both cylindrical and end shear contributions.

Engineers use Su to estimate bearing capacity (Nc·Su), lateral earth pressures, and stability numbers for embankments (Taylor’s stability charts). The value also appears in empirical correlations with SPT N-value and CPT tip resistance for fine-grained soils.

Case Study: Embankment on Soft Clay

A highway embankment 4m high is to be constructed over a 6m layer of soft clay (Su = 18 kPa). Using the Taylor stability chart, the undrained stability number Ns = γH / Su = (17 kN/m³ × 4m) / 18 ≈ 3.78. For φ=0, this indicates potential failure. The design required prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) and staged construction to increase Su via consolidation. Our calculator helps rapidly determine Su from field vane or lab tests to support such analysis.

⚠️ Engineering practice note: This tool provides an estimate of Su for saturated cohesive soils under ideal conditions. Actual geotechnical design must account for:
  • Sample disturbance, anisotropy, and strain rate effects
  • Soil sensitivity (see note below) – peak vs. remoulded strength
  • Partial factors per Eurocode 7 (EN 1997-1: γcu typically 1.4–1.6) or local practice
  • Site-specific variability – always validate with multiple tests and professional judgement
⚠️ Not a substitute for detailed site investigation or licensed geotechnical engineering analysis.
Influence of soil sensitivity (St): For highly sensitive quick clays (St > 8–10), the undisturbed peak Su measured by vane or UCS may be several times larger than the remoulded strength. This dramatically affects post-peak stability, progressive failure, and retrogression. In such soils, consider using fall-cone tests, field vane with correction factors (Bjerrum, 1972), or advanced laboratory testing. Typical sensitivity values: low sensitivity St 1-2, medium 2-4, sensitive 4-8, extra sensitive >8.

Typical Su Correlations with In-Situ Tests (CPT / SPT)

Soil type / consistency Su range (kPa) CPT qc / SPT N60 correlation Reference
Very soft clay <12 qc < 0.3 MPa; N60 0–2 Lunne et al. (1997)
Soft clay 12–25 qc 0.3–0.6 MPa; N60 2–4 CPT in clays (Nkt ≈ 15–20)
Firm clay 25–50 qc 0.6–1.2 MPa; N60 4–8 Bowles (1996)
Stiff clay 50–100 qc 1.2–2.5 MPa; N60 8–15 Stroud (1974)
Very stiff clay 100–200 qc 2.5–4.0 MPa; N60 15–30 Mayne (2007)
Hard clay >200 qc >4 MPa; N60 >30 Various
Note: Correlations are empirical; site-specific calibration recommended. CPT-based Su = (qc - σv0) / Nkt where Nkt typically 10–20 for clays.

Frequently Asked Questions

Undrained conditions prevail during rapid loading (e.g., earthquakes, storm waves, construction). Su directly governs short-term stability.

For sensitive clays, a correction factor μ (Bjerrum, 1972) may be applied, but our calculator provides the basic peak strength. In practice, use μ = 0.8–0.9 for soft clays.

The undrained strength concept is most reliable for saturated cohesive soils. For unsaturated soils, additional suction effects occur.

Marine soft clays like Bangkok clay often have Su between 15–35 kPa at shallow depths, increasing with depth due to overburden.
Geotechnical Reference Standards: This tool follows ASTM D2166 / D2850 / D2573 and the principles outlined in “Craig’s Soil Mechanics” (8th ed.) and “Terzaghi, Peck, Mesri” (1996). Data validation performed against laboratory datasets from the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) and USGS soil reports.
Tool version 2.1 — Compliant with Eurocode 7 and ASTM practice. Last technical review: April 2026.